Friday, December 5, 2008

simply not simple...

Darwin did not have the blessing of having electron microscopes that we have today.  Darwin himself said "if it can be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possible have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down".  (Origin of Species) 1872 p. 154. 
     What you see above is the nail in the coffin for the Darwinian evolutionary theory.  A recent email from an evolutionist said " I am asking you to not look around at all the different species now present, but for the fun of it go back to a time when a simple cell miscodes and starts a new direction." There is a problem with this, you cannot back to when the cell was simple that time does not exist!! The cell from the very start has been complex and there simply is no evidence that ever shows a time when the cell was anything but complex! 
Life in all aspects of it, when properly studied reveals that there is simply nothing simple about life.  From the tiniest cell (which by the way you are made up of billions of) to the complex galaxy and even further the universe in which we exist is absolutely, mind blowing, unfathomably complex!! How does this level of complexity arise by chance and left to itself. This the evolutionist simply do not have an answer for. 

Check out this website and realize that we are fearfully and wonderfully made... Psalm 139 


  1. Hi Chris,

    I appreciate the spammed post on my blog. I deleted one and posted the other.
    No, Darwin did not have an electron microscope, nor did he know about DNA. Had he, I predict that the would have really enjoyed the vast amount of evidence supporting his basic premise that one can find there.

    Are cells 'simple'? Not really. But simply arguing that they are so complex that could not have arisen by (the old strawman misrepresentation) 'chance' and thus evolution is false and thus biblical creationism is true is just wrong on so many levels.

    And I wouldn't be so quick to trust the claims made by folks at the ICR in the first place - they require all of those associated with them to take oaths that they will never cast doubt on creationism and have a pretty good track record of having their, shall we say, less than honest antics exposed.

    Google Stuart Nevins.

  2. Is it me but where is the evidence ??

  3. I could ask the same about your posts on this subject.