God created the sea monsters, God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind; and God saw that it was good. Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind"; and it was so. God made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:24-25
Over and over in Divine truth we read this phrase "after their kind". One almost comes to the conclusion that "ok we get the point" kind of thinking. Why out of His eternal genius would the Holy Spirit decide to use this phrase so many times?? He knew that truth shortly after He inspired these words would be under attack and would remain under attack until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Yet lets look at this phrase for a second. God created each species of animal after their own kind. So God did not create 1/2 fish 1/2 birds/ He did not create 1/2 man 1/2 primate. The Bible is clear that God created each living creature after their kind. Now there existed a gene pool within each kind if you will. The potential for a many variety of dogs existed within the created dog, and we see the results of this today. We see many varities of dogs, my mom has a poodle that drives me crazy. Yet we never see in the fossil record or from any other evidence, a dog transitioning into a cat. God out of His creative genuis confined the species to be able to breed only within a given species. Never do we see a giraffe being able to breed with a donkey. God has set boundaries.
Natural Selection as coined by the evolutionist is the process that removes qualities that are less favorable for the conditions and as a result new spieces are formed.
Natural selection is the process by which favorable heritable traits become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable heritable traits become less common, due to differential reproduction of genotypes. Over time, this process may result in adaptations that specialize organisms for particular ecological niches and may eventually result in the emergence of new species. In other words, natural selection is the mechanism by which evolution may take place within a given population of organisms.
Never have we seen in the fossil record or from the naked eye emergence of new species. http://www.icr.org/natural-selection/ The battle for truth is still being waged
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Before you ask no this is not the bass I caught this week. This is the remains of a fish captured in a fossil, now this fossil dates back hundreds if not thousands of years. Now the ?? begs to be asked where is the change? Well the evolutionist would say it takes time to change, they do not happen over hundreds or even thousands of years, it takes millions. Yet there is only one problem with the missing link, it is missing because it does not exist.
The Nebraska man which was found was supposed to be the coveted missing link. Something like 50 evolutionary scientist got their P.H.D.'s from Nebraska man. Come to find out Nebraska man turned out to be a pigs tooth. What does that say about those men's P.H.D's? They are as good as toilet paper. Lucy was the nail in the coffin, scientist have determined lucy is an ape. There has even been "missing links" that have turned out to be dinosaur fossils with feathers glued to them! I am totally not joking about this, check this out for yourself. I know it is almost comical. Oh the depths that people will go to, to deny God and to suppress the truth that He alone is Creator and Sustainer of all life.
Romans 1:21 For even though they knew God they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but became futile in their speculations and their foolish hearts were darkened
Evolutionist are always saying that creationist are "crazy people" who walk by blind faith. Isn't that something. Now I am a Bible believing Christian and let me tell you something, I cannot answer for anyone else but I certainly do not walk by blind faith. The faith which Christians walk by is intelligent faith based upon the evidence that supports the Word of God.
No other book in human history has been put through the scrutiny that the Bible has, and come forth shining in all of its glory. There has never been one archeological find, not one that has discredited the Bible. There has been over 25,000 archeological finds that determine that the Biblical writers were accurate in the things that they wrote. In the movie Expelled Michael Ruse says that he believes life "piggy backed" on the back of crystals to the earth. What??!!! And this guy is a credible science? Talk about blind faith, where in the world is the evidence for that? Also wouldn't have the earth's atmosphere burned up the crystals thus destroying the life that was "hitching a ride". This is comical, it really does take more faith to believe this, than it does that there is an all powerful Creator God.
I will join in what Mr. Ben Stein says in his awesome movie "I thought we were talking about science not science fiction". This is crazy that they would even begin to believe something along these lines much less teach to people! Yet they call the Bible fairy tale?? You decide.
Romans 1:18 for the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness
The 2nd law of thermodynamics (aka entropy) says in essence everything is moving from a state of order to a state of disorder. In other words things are breaking down. This law of science is seen in everything from the human body to the automobile in which you drive. Want to deny entropy, never change the oil, fluids, check the air pressure in your tires, fill your car with gas etc, and entropy is going to take place. Now keep in mind this is a law of science. There are very few laws of science because a law of science has to be absolutely the case and be tried many many times before it can be declared a law.
So think about this for a second if everything is moving from a state of order to disorder as this law of science shows, then that would mean that there was one time when everything was in pristine condition. This would mean that everything at one time was at its best and is now wearing down and eventually will one day wear out. Yet this is exactly the opposite of what evolutionist teach!!! They teach the primitive earth was a flat, ugly, mess. Keep in mind the 2nd law of thermodynamics is just that a law. Why do I emphasize this? Listen to what one evolutionary website proclaims and in doing so denies a law of science.
"The infant earth that is pictured by scientist today basks in a sun that shines with 70% of its present power (now they say the power of the sun is getting stronger but a law of science denies this!!). A world with no free oxygen in the atmosphere (how can there be no oxygen when they say the ocean existed H2O oxygen is present in water!!!) and no sounds other than wind, the hissing lava against water (H2O!!), and meteorites hitting the earth. (By the way all of this is speculative, there is no evidence that supports this story of the early earth). No plants, no animals, no bacteria, or viruses existed on the earth. From that point on, scientific opinion vastly diversifies. (So most if not all scientist agree up to this point, thus denying the law of entropy!!!). It continues, " in a steamy world after accretion, earth may have been ( again speculating) a ball of fiery magma. Volcanoes, geysers, and hydrothermal vents would have leached out vital compounds where reactions could ensue (and they call the Bible fantasy??!!)".
Anyway you get the point that they say oh the earth was a mess and we are getting better. The 2nd law of thermodynamics a law of science denies this. It says everything was great and is getting worse. Yet what does the Bible say " and God saw everything that He had made and behold it was very good" Genesis 1:31. The Bible says that in the beginning everything was very good and after the fall of man is getting worse. Not coincidence that this agrees amazingly with a law of science.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
An Agenda?? Recently I was blessed with the opportunity to see Expelled by Mr. Ben Stein. I loved it!! I cannot imagine that it would be a best seller on Richard Dawkins or Paul Meyers list. Yet in this movie it exposes the real agenda that the evolutionist have. I have to wonder why is it that they will not even begin to allow Intelligent Design to be taught in schools? I am a youth minister and I have worked with kids extensively for several years now, and let me tell you these kids are intelligent (this due to random chance and dumb luck of course). Yet I wonder why both evidences are presented and let the student decide where the evidence leads them.
The theory of evolution is one that is built on sinking sand! First of all you have people like Stanley Miller who could not produce life in a test tube, or men like Haeckal who lied about his "embryos". Yet these 2 are still in science books today, now the one man failed and the other lied and yet they are still deemed credible??? Or what about the Nebraska man which turned out to be a pigs tooth and something like 50 scientist got their P.H.D's from this. What does that say about their degrees? They are as good as a kleenex on a cold day!!
Yet with all of this evidence against evolution they still say that creation is not science. Let me ask you then what defines science? It certainly cannot be evidence because there is none for evolution. It has to be opinion. Be careful because behind every opinion there is lurking an agenda somewhere in the midst.
Let God be true though every man a liar
Why is the evidence for the Bible so quickly swept under the rug? What about kings who were named by name 200 years before they were even born (Isaiah 45). Psalm 22 says they have pierced My hands and My feet. This was 800 years before crucifixion was even practiced and 1100 years before Christ came to earth. The mathematical odds for Jesus to fulfill 7 prophecies (keep in mind He fulfilled hundreds) would be the same odds as you covering the entire earth in 4inchX4inch white tiles, with a gold star hidden underneath only one tile, and you walking up on the very 1st try and finding it. Oh by the way you are blindfolded! Now you may say well that is impossible, can you imagine what the odds are for Jesus to fulfill all the prophecies He did?! They are astronomical, they cannot be fathomed. Only God knows perfectly the future and has shown that He certainly knows by predicting with pin point accuracy events well into the future. 1/4 of the Bible is prophetic and of all the prophecies that have to do with past events all have come true. not one of them has failed. God's Word has a 100% track record when it comes to pronouncing what will take place. How can one disbelieve when there is that much evidence??
I am God and there is no other, I am God and there is no one like Me. Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things which have not been done.
A fact according to the New Oxford American Dictionary is "a thing that is indisputably the case". The problem is marco evolution does not fit into this category. Macro evolution has never been observed via the fossil record or the naked eye. There was a head of a British museum who contacted the head of a museum in New York. Now both of these men were P.H.D's, staunch evolutionist, and had been for 30+ years. The head of the British asked "give me one fact of evolution. One fact we know for sure" He said "all I got was silence". He then proceeded to call the head of a museum in Chicago, again another lifelong evolutionist. He asked him likewise "give me one fact we know for sure about evolution, he said all I got was silence and then I got I know it shouldn't be taught in schools"!! What in the world? How can we form a whole scientific "theory" on something that is completely void of facts?? Charles Darwin said if transitional fossils were never found, he was wrong. He also said that if it can be shown that intricate organelles exist in the cell he was wrong. No transitional fossils has ever been found and we have found intricate organelles in a cell! So why haven't the evolutionist abandoned the "theory" that Darwin himself would have abandoned by his own admission by now?? They are holding on to a belief with zero evidence and they say that creationist are the ones who walk by blind faith!! If there is anyone who can give me one fact for evolution please do so, my email is Lousisvchr@aol.com.
Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse!!