Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Oh No!!! WHere are my facts???

A fact according to the New Oxford American Dictionary is "a thing that is indisputably the case". The problem is marco evolution does not fit into this category. Macro evolution has never been observed via the fossil record or the naked eye. There was a head of a British museum who contacted the head of a museum in New York. Now both of these men were P.H.D's, staunch evolutionist, and had been for 30+ years. The head of the British asked "give me one fact of evolution. One fact we know for sure" He said "all I got was silence". He then proceeded to call the head of a museum in Chicago, again another lifelong evolutionist. He asked him likewise "give me one fact we know for sure about evolution, he said all I got was silence and then I got I know it shouldn't be taught in schools"!! What in the world? How can we form a whole scientific "theory" on something that is completely void of facts?? Charles Darwin said if transitional fossils were never found, he was wrong. He also said that if it can be shown that intricate organelles exist in the cell he was wrong. No transitional fossils has ever been found and we have found intricate organelles in a cell! So why haven't the evolutionist abandoned the "theory" that Darwin himself would have abandoned by his own admission by now?? They are holding on to a belief with zero evidence and they say that creationist are the ones who walk by blind faith!! If there is anyone who can give me one fact for evolution please do so, my email is Lousisvchr@aol.com. 

Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse!! 


  1. Dude, take a moment to learn something before you speak. Your ignorance will only convince those who are as ignorant as yourself.

    For a recent paper on some observed evolution, look up Blount et al. from Lenski's lab. It's in PNAS from this year.

    Also, I am definitely not coming back until you change the white-on-black style. It hurts my eyes, man.
    And then, I probably still won't come back.

  2. I'm still wondering where your facts are.
    I suppose you could claim ignorance of the subject as an excuse, but come on now.
    Crack a second book open, or avoid talking about subjects of which you have no knowledge.

  3. Here is some facts for you fellows. There is a fact of irreducible complexity. This says that a cell for instance is so complex and if any organelles of the cell were reduced then life would cease. So how does this fit into the idea of natural selection?? Also There is the scientific fact of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. This law of science states that everything is moving from order to disorder. Yet the evolutionist will say the very opposite. They say that the earth in the beginning was a flat ugly mess, and everything in essence is getting better. They have to deny a law of science to attempt to prove a flawed theory. Yet this is not what we see in the world, we see the opposite entropy is taking over and everything is moving to disorder. Yet what does God's Word say?? And God saw all that He had made and behold it was very good. Genesis 1:31 This was in the beginning

  4. Irreducible complexity is not a fact - it is a sound bite. Stating something doesn't make it true.

    Evolution does not break the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Entropy increases overall within a closed system. The important word is 'overall'. Areas of reduced entropy result in other areas of increased entropy.

    Quoting words from you sky daddy myths doesn't amount to evidence of anything. I can say "and so it was spoken that on the third day the cats grew wings and flew; so sayeth the lord" that doesn't make my cat fly.